Sample 01 Content strategy
"Cadence," a two-quarter organic plan
How I decide what is worth publishing before anyone writes it, and how I would know whether it moved anything.
The problem we solve for the buyer
Marketing teams don't search for "content operations software." They search the pain: missed deadlines, scattered calendars, approvals stuck in DMs. So the plan buys the problem language first and introduces the product second, usually in the last third of the piece.
Audience and intent
| Segment | What they search | What we publish |
|---|---|---|
| IC marketer (drowning) | "content calendar template" | Templates and how-to guides |
| Marketing manager (evaluating) | "content workflow tools" | Comparison and use-case content |
| Head of marketing (deciding) | "content operations ROI" | Case studies and ROI breakdowns |
Content pillars
Three pillars, deliberately uneven. Most of the volume goes to planning, because that is where the search demand actually is: calendars, briefs, templates. A smaller run covers production speed and approvals, aimed at people already using a tool and unhappy with it. The thinnest pillar is measurement and ROI, which almost nobody searches for and every head of marketing asks about on the call.
Channel logic
Search does the compounding: pillar pages with clusters underneath them. YouTube is here because the product is a workflow, and a workflow is faster to show than to describe. Email is the only channel with a conversion job, turning template downloaders into trials. One production pass feeds all three.
How we measure it
Leading: organic sessions, video watch time, template downloads. Lagging: organic-attributed trial signups, trial-to-paid rate. Monthly review, and any format that has not moved a leading indicator in two cycles comes out of the calendar.